News update
  • 100 CSOs rally against Trump’s trade tactics, urge access to drugs     |     
  • BNP believes in multiparty democracy, not revenge: Moyeen Khan     |     
  • Bangladesh reaffirms commitment to revitalise SAARC process     |     
  • Bangla Academy assures inclusive Ekushey Book Fair From Feb 26     |     
  • 2 former National University VCs face travel ban     |     

Trump’s Iran Strategy Remains Unclear Amid Military Buildup

GreenWatch Desk: World News 2026-02-23, 12:40pm

img-20260223-wa0012-34ee96e646df823ddeb1a199e51ebafe1771828858.jpg

US President Donald Trump speaks during a dinner with state governors in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on 21 February, 2026.



President Donald Trump has issued repeated threats against Iran, but the long-term US objectives remain vague, whether in the case of a brief strike or a sustained conflict.

The US has deployed warships, fighter jets, and tens of thousands of troops to the region, giving Trump multiple options that could significantly destabilize the Middle East. Potential actions include targeted strikes on Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, attacks on its missile program, or attempts to pressure regime change in Tehran. Iran has warned of severe retaliation if attacked.

Trump has said he will decide within 10 to 15 days whether to strike Iran if a nuclear deal is not reached. Reports indicate he has been presented with military options ranging from targeted attacks on the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, to broader campaigns.

While Trump often emphasises a preference for diplomacy addressing nuclear, missile, and militant group concerns, Iran has refused such concessions. Recent indirect talks in Oman and Switzerland have failed to narrow the gap, though discussions are set to continue.

Analysts suggest the administration may be aiming for a limited conflict to shift regional power without becoming entangled in a prolonged war. Critics warn of unpredictable consequences, with potential risks to Gulf allies and uncertainty over Iran’s response. The complexity of Iran’s political structure makes any strike potentially destabilising, with no guarantee of weakening the regime.